I just thought I would take a moment to mention that "biology isn't destiny" from my previous post implies an acceptance of the existence of free will. I have yet to see a convincing argument for the actual existence of free will. I have also never seen a useful memetic, epistemic, metaphysical, or ethical structure based on the assumption that there is no free will.
Since no one has ever convinced me of the necessity of free will or its inverse, and the assumption of free will seems both functionally and esthetically superior, that's what I'll be assuming.
Inevitably,
Michael Phillips
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(231)
-
▼
April
(25)
- 4th edition stumbling
- More book lists.
- The identifiers are longer than the post... again.
- Avoidance memes
- feminist issues
- Last little brother post for a bit.
- Reading Little Brother. And other Things
- t-shirts
- Little Brother ARC
- remembered one of the things I'd intended to say.
- I think this is going to be a miscellaneous post.F...
- And then there's the ever charming Alex Kochno
- My current computer is a Frankenstein's monster fo...
- not about Love Hina
- Today has been math day for Michael. I've got a de...
- I just thought I would take a moment to mention th...
- I just ran into another example of something that ...
- Today's lesson for the day? Unlike Firefox, Pidgin...
- No title
- 1. Ex Mechana 3 Er, it’s been 3 months since I rea...
- Silence broken.A familiar sound.I look back.You ar...
- My username is _____ because ____.ronin_kakuhitoTh...
- Here's a build I've always wanted to run, tenth le...
- The quality control on the 3rd party D&D books? No...
- Today I realized that I love process texts. That's...
-
▼
April
(25)
About Me
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment