97. Aerie Mercedes Lackey. So yeah, Lackey is my guilty pleasure. I’ve been reading the “The Dragon Jousters” series as they come out. I think there has been a backlash recently against the likes of Robert Joran, George Martin, Kevin Anderson, and David Webber. (And personally, only Webber and Martin of those four could actually pull off both “long” and “good” at the same time, and you are free to argue about Webber.) This book felt like it had been edited down by 80,000 words, and not the 80,000 words that every King or Hubbard (well okay, Hubbard’s novels need to lose more than that. All of the words would have been a good starting point) novel needs to be edited down, but the 80,000 words that were dropped from Stranger. The ones that added depth to the story. (Stranger worked in the short form, but it was, I thought, a better book in the unabridged version. Especially the scene where Jubal lost an argument. People accuse Heinlein, somewhat rightly, of having one older always right Heinlein-stand in in his storys (and several other Heinlein stand ins in most of his stories. Number of the Beast 4 in the first section and most of the Heinlein stand in characters from his other books in the last sections. I loved the tip of the hat to the Dorsai irregulars at the end. Apparently they actually helped him out a lot at one con where he kept getting lost.) Oh yeah, this is about Lackey...
...
Well, it felt for a bit that there was going to be one of those idiot love triangle plots where a and b have a stupid misunderstanding and c courts b innocently, and everything is out of whack because a and b are obviously destined to be together. Actually you can drop c out and it is still a dumb plot. *cough Bujold cough cough*1 But then it didn’t happen. C did have one of those blinding realizations and a and b made up and never really noticed c’s interest and that was annoying. If you start the gambit, don’t just make it go away without at least having some interaction leading to it.
Oh yeah, about my comment at the start. Yeah, this book was over edited, but it also really needed to be 2 books. The lead up should have been one book and the other bits should have been the second.
Ooh, I just thought about a way to make the fizzled romantic hijinks plot more interesting. A and b carry on, only apparently distanced because of outside responsibilities but getting along quite well when c can’t see them. C keeps following a, and falling in love, completely unnoticed by a, and only realizes that a didn’t return the feelings when a and b get married or some such At least there wouldn’t have been the magical revelation scene. I still would have been annoyed by c, but less so as she was resolved in a more logical conclusion type manner. Longest entry yet. Much of which was, sadly only peripherally about things that were peripherally about the book.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(84)
-
▼
November
(18)
- things in progress
- Also Annie, you were right. The beginning does owe...
- Oi vey. I've got a couple of sets of stories that ...
- *blink* That is... bleak.
- 12:30ish 11/23/2006. Guess that makes me 27. I was...
- The kids these days with their word processor base...
- So in the game last night I got to playtest a new ...
- http://www.amazon.com/Dora-Aquapet-Explorer-Wild-P...
- Bold the ones you've read, strike-out the ones you...
- So, I just did something that I haven't done in qu...
- more about grad school
- So, it looks like I'll be going to Bloomington on ...
- 97. Aerie Mercedes Lackey. So yeah, Lackey is my g...
- New York City's Board of health is considering all...
- So, as of 10 till midnight here in Indiana, it loo...
- lank Label Comics' Dave Kellett needs your help. H...
- So, I spent much of last week making six Imperial ...
- Spellsword 66% Combativeness, ...
-
▼
November
(18)
About Me
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment