Blog Archive

I just thought I would take a moment to mention that "biology isn't destiny" from my previous post implies an acceptance of the existence of free will. I have yet to see a convincing argument for the actual existence of free will. I have also never seen a useful memetic, epistemic, metaphysical, or ethical structure based on the assumption that there is no free will.
Since no one has ever convinced me of the necessity of free will or its inverse, and the assumption of free will seems both functionally and esthetically superior, that's what I'll be assuming.

Michael Phillips

No comments: